psikd7r0l5
发表于 2012-4-26 00:39:41
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
In recent years, the living area of humankind is expanding fast, since the global population growing rapidly. In relative terms, the territory of wildlife's activities has narrowed dramatically. In this case, some people try to save them because wildlife was being threatened. Although conventional wisdom has it that spend abundant money and resources on saving wild animals from dying is worthless, the reality of the situation is often far more complicated than that.
Firstly, wildlife protection is to protect precious natural resources and it is very important. In any event, we have to remain species diversity as every one of them is playing a key role in the food chain. Moreover, there are imitating interactions amongst different species and the dying out of a particular species will definitely influence on survival of others. What is obvious is that human finally could be the victim. Consequently, saving the rare wild animals has a great value.
Secondly, mankind has obligations to save wild animals, not only because we cut down forests, thereby expanding the areas and it lead to environmental destruction at the same time, which this kind of action seriously affect the sustainable living environment of wildlife, but also due to hunting them on purpose.
Last but not least, the present generation of people should think about the legacy, which will be inherited by descendants. In fact, the unspoiled environment, and the existence of wild animals is one of the most essential contributions to the future generations of people.
To sum up, owing to we take many factors into consideration, such as: the future of humanity, the importance of maintaining species diversity, and our duties, I am convinced that we ought to protect wild animals as much as possible.
[]
x
psikd7r0l5
发表于 2012-4-26 12:02:17
Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree? Give your reasons and personal experience.
In present-day society, as the global recession continues, it becomes harder for the graduated students to find a suitable job. Some people claim that granting that elders retire earlier, the new generation would obtain more opportunities. To my mind, however, I do not wholly agree with it.
On the one hand, it is true that youngsters can take advantage of the circumstance that senior employees quit their job earlier. Obviously, the company will gain more headcount to hire younger employees. That is to say, junior candidates will access to more opportunities to get an offer and the competitions amongst them will be less intense. Simultaneously, as the high level colleagues’ leaving, the youngster who had hired by the company already will promote to senior level. As a result, the salary and individual welfare thus be increased. Hence, it is undeniable that the younger generation does take advantage of elder’s early retirement.
On the other hand, some serious problems occur when companies encourage high level employees to leave. Even though the company will have a chance to hire some new employees who do not need pay big salaries for, thereby reducing labor cost, but companies still lose abundant money on dismissal wage. Besides, the company has to face the risk of promoting junior staffs because they do not have rich relevant experiences and nobody knows whether they can do the same excellent job as their ex-colleagues or not. Notably, it is too late to find a qualified mentor for the new heads because the perfect teachers had left already.
Given the above argument, it is reasonable to conclude that advantages and disadvantages are coexisting when companies encourage senior employees to take early retirement. Consequently, I am convinced that the company should take into serious consideration before taking the action.